Lectionary Sermon for October 14 on Mark Ch10: 17-31

The Rich Young Man and the Eye of the Needle
While today’s story is very familiar to many Christians, what is more intriguing is why so many of us who claim to accept Christianity happily accumulate riches and possessions and do little to show that such a reading should affect our day to day lives.

I suspect we prefer to forget the confronting aspects of Jesus’ illustration and give passing acknowledgement that that the wealthy have just as much need as everyone else to put some genuine effort into their commitment to what we might now call being a genuine follower of Christ. That the disciples were astonished at Jesus’ words when the young man gave up on the next step of his quest suggests there is a bit more going on here than might at first meet the eye.

Unsurprisingly, the rich young man’s question and Jesus’ answer seem more acceptable when disconnected from our reality, particularly when it comes to our individual personal situations. It might help to remind ourselves that just as Mark records the young man being unaware of his faults when he comes to Jesus, we too run the risk of noticing the rich young man’s faults yet not noticing the potential similarity with our own.

If it comes to that I can’t honestly say I know of many who have taken this story seriously – certainly at least not enough to follow Jesus advice in the form of literal action. Jesus seemingly puts the bar too high for the average churchgoer, let alone for the sceptical adherent. I guess since not many are excessively wealthy there may even be some consolation for most of us in the hearing about the young man’s discomfort at Jesus’ reply. “Give away everything you own and follow me” is Jesus’ reply. And of course the rich man, realising just how hard it would be to take that step of commitment, admits to himself he would have too much to lose and goes away sorrowful.

Jesus’ striking metaphor is in his response. “It is harder for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God than for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle.”

I am taking it that camel and needle part is not new for many here today. Since Sunday school days many of us may well have heard the often repeated claim that the eye of the needle was actually a small gate in the Jerusalem wall through which a camel would have difficulty passing – and it is usually stressed in the telling, that for the camel this would be difficult but by no means impossible. Remove the camel’s saddle and other paraphernalia and you could do it with a bit of encouragement especially if the squeeze came after the camel had used up some of the fat in its hump turning it to water after many days in the desert.

No doubt some Bible scholars would point out that the meaning of the metaphor is by no means done and dusted. Perhaps Jesus was actually saying it is actually impossible rather than difficult – for if he meant a real camel and a real needle there is absolutely no way you could get the camel through the eye of the needle.

Well if it comes to that some scholars actually say in effect : “Nah – it is simply a mistranslation”. Presumably Jesus was talking Aramaic and in Aramaic the word for camel (gamla) is virtually the same as the Aramaic for rope (which is sometimes even spelt the same way) and only changes its meaning according to context. A Greek speaker like Mark, recording the conversation in Greek years later might easily have missed this point. It would certainly make for a more consistent metaphor if Jesus had said it was the rope that was hard to get through the eye of the needle. And then for “hard” understand “impossible”.

But really this is all just academic. Whichever way you look at it, we have a colourful metaphor to stress that attachment to riches somehow gets in the way of following Christ. This then brings us to what it might mean for us today.

The clue here is the Greek word Mark translates for money – “chremata”. Chremata, Aristotle defines for us as being all those things for which the value is measured in money. This should rightly concern those who preach or follow a prosperity gospel – ie one in which God is supposed to materially prosper those who find his favour.

I suspect that Jews following the popular teachings from the scripture in Jesus day would take this prosperity for the faithful as a matter of course. The Jews (and that includes the disciples) might have taken the young man’s prosperity as a sign that he was favoured by God. For example in Psalm 37 verse 25 it even states “ I have not seen the righteous forsaken nor his seed begging for bread”.

That Jesus should have apparently ignored this standard view ( and what is more, ignored a view with scriptural warrant) would indeed have caused the disciples to do a double take. Jesus appears to be implying – and quite directly – that to the extent we focus on such matters and come to expect fortune as being the natural and even essential God-given deserved reward, we are drawn away from the focus on his mission.

To rely on single teachings supporting personal advancement while missing the main themes like expressing love for ones fellows or seeking justice would indeed be a gross misuse of the Bible. I assume Jesus himself believed that scripture represented the word of God, yet we do not have to reflect too deeply to notice that through the centuries sincere believers have done unfortunate and even hideous things to their fellows in the mistaken belief that this is what scriptures told them to do.

I remember reading once somewhere that the Bible is not so much to be taken as the word of God as offering the potential to be the word of God for the thoughtful seeker.

For those who like to find new ways of looking at a familiar issue, you might be interested to know that the Dalai Lama makes a similar point with a slightly different twist. Basically his point was that the religion is found in our attitudes to others – not in the trappings which can so easily distract us. Listen now to his words …… His Holiness, the Dalai Lama puts it this way:

A religious act is performed out of good motivation with sincere thought for the benefit of others. Religion is here and now in our daily lives. If we lead that life for the benefit of the world, this is the hallmark of a religious life. This is my simple religion. No need for temples. No need for complicated philosophy. Your own mind, your own heart is the temple; your philosophy is simple kindness.”

And as with those who would follow Jesus – it is actually giving up the focus on the trappings and being freed to look around to those we meet with eyes of sympathy and concern – and if that doesn’t work – perhaps even giving up the trappings in a literal sense, which is Jesus suggested path back to that key centrality.

It is a paradox of the 21st century that even as a nation, the richer we get, the more ethical problems come our way. Many of us are born into comparative wealth, while others are born into unremitting poverty which rather cuts across the notion that each will be rewarded in proportion to our individual faith and effort.

For example living in a nation where the soil is reasonably productive, good mineral resources, where the weather is temperate, and where the population is relatively sparse, it is much more expected that profitable mining or primary food production might give the nation a base for development. Contrast this with a region where there are severe weather conditions, perhaps an arid desert or frozen tundra, few natural resources and where there is sparse plant life and over-population. The relative figures for GNP in such contrasting settings tell their own story and the relative wealth of one nation compared with another challenge us to look again at how we are living out our responsibility to those less fortunate.

Yet when we listen to our politicians offering promises for each election, it is “chremata” that rules. For those of us born in favourable settings, it is surprising how little attention we ask our leaders to give to the need for distributive justice.

Please note that Jesus never says don’t earn money. It is rather our attitude to earning, our attitude to others while we are earning, and how we organise our giving that demonstrates where our heart lies.

John Wesley’s dictum of “Earn all you can, save all you can and give all you can” is much more outwardly focussed than what Aristotle would no doubt call the “chremata” attention of some of this nation’s moneyed classes.

Jesus needed to put his teaching into metaphor to lift his listeners to a point where they might encounter meaning in his message.
In the same way every now and again we need our poets and hymn writers to edge us towards an understanding which is hard to define in a clinical sense.

Dr. Haldor Lillenas, a well known hymn-writer, has taken this topic and set it as a poem entitled, “Poverty.” (I am still looking for a familiar hymn tune to set this as a hymn – ideas anyone??)

POVERTY
If in my heart there is no love for those by sin defiled
And if I lack compassion for a wayward, wand’ring child;
If I possess no strong desire to help him in his need,
To lead him back to paths of peace, Then I am poor indeed.

If I have lost the tenderness, the grace I once possessed,
If I cannot appreciate another soul’s distress;
If I have not within my breast a willingness to feed
The hungry multitude of earth, Then I am poor indeed.

If I have not the strength to feel another’s burden sore,
If I am blind to all the needs that clamour at my door;
If I am deaf to all the cry of hearts that break and bleed
Without the sympathy of love, Then I am poor indeed.

If I cannot appreciate the good in those I meet,
If in my blindness I abhor the outcast on the street;
And if my hard, cold heart desires to crush the bruised reed–
Then know that I have lost my wealth, Then I am poor indeed.

And if I thrill not at the touch of dimpled baby hands,
Nor feel the wealth my humble home and all its love commands
And if the finer things of life are lost in grasp and greed
Then in my heart a beggar dwells, And he is poor indeed!

If I have love for those who hate and tears for those who fall,
If I have mercy for the one who loves me not at all;
If I have patience with the one who holds another creed,
A heart for all, the wide, wide world, Then I am rich indeed!

…….And to this poem, the thoughtful Christian might say AMEN

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Progressive Sermons, Sermons and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Lectionary Sermon for October 14 on Mark Ch10: 17-31

  1. Hi! Loved this post!

    Hmm…I’ve been thinking about your question– setting those lovely lyrics to music excites me as a young aspiring theologian, philosopher, and musician…

    Ok, so, before I reveal my idea– here’s the process I went through:

    after a few rounds of speaking each syllable whilst using my fingers to mark the amount,

    and after writing the results of my findings on a sheet of paper (i.e. each paragraph/stanza appears to consist of 4 lines of 14 syllables: that is to say, I would ideally look for a tune with an attached syllable-rhythm like 14.14.14.14. in the metrical index),

    I grabbed a hymnal in my room (i.e. “Songs for Worship & Praise”: Shape Note Edition, Compiled & Edited by Robert J. Taylor, Jr.) & paid a visit to a super duper cool “Metrical Index of Tunes” appendix in the back of the book.

    I didn’t find any hymns matching my metrical analysis of the hymn-lyrics above.

    However, I figured that 14.14.14.14. would probably work just as well with something like a 7.7.7.7. syllabic schematic.

    I found out that pre-existing 4 occurrences of 7 (i.e. 7.7.7.7.) hymns would be somewhat awkward to try to match with the 14.14.14.14 lyrics, but I was getting warmer…

    I found a hymn that had a meter of 5 occurrences of 7 (i.e. 7.7.7.7.7.)– good ol’ Mr. Mendelssohn’s 1840 tune that many have come to remember best as “Hark! the Herald Angels Sing”. I thought I was done at that point, but there was a problem…To make tying the 14.14.14.14 lyrics to this 7.7.7.7. hymn work, we’d need to have a repeat of the last line of each stanza/paragraph in the 14.14.14.14. piece. Getting warmer still…

    So I went back to the drawing board…and I thought: “Hmm…What about these hymns listed as 6 occurrences of 7 (i.e. 7.7.7.7.7.7.)? Would they work any better than the previous ones?” As it seems to turn out: yes they do! After some vocal experimenting, I’ve come to the conclusion that the 14.14.14.14. lyrics would work quite well with 7.7.7.7.7.7. tunes like– e.g. “Dix” (we probably recognize this best as “For the Beauty of the Earth”) & “Toplady” (we probably recognize this best as “Rock of Ages”).

    After having done all that work, though, I’m thinking about possibly composing a fresh tune for these wonderful lyrics– if that would be permitted! Exciting!

    This was fun!

    *P.S. Also, thanks for this exercise! It’s been a semester since I’ve finished Music Theory 4 at Palomar Community College & it’s always awesome to have a challenge!

    • peddiebill says:

      I am not a music specialist and have only written a handful of hymns myself (see elsewhere on my site) but I appreciate the effort and thought you have put into your comment. I am currently looking at getting ideas for hymns with rhythms from popular songs and chords from the cycle of fifths before writing the melody line to fit. I am also experimenting with hymn themes from modern prayers from some of the more outstanding liturgists. It is however only a work in progress so I don’t know yet if it will work.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.